Vaccine Information Database

Vaccines

If you are a parent or future parent flooded with the conflicting information out there about vaccines, you can check out this collection of reliable,  evidence-based resources to help you make an educated decision for your family. Whether it's common issues/worries parents face regarding vaccines, refuting misinformation, or just directing you to the proper resources, hopefully this can help you navigate fact from fiction. 

Before you dive in, you may wonder how I can be "scrunchy" or "clean living" and vaccinate my kids. But the two are not mutually exclusive. I breastfed, room shared, and have been home with my babies since birth. I feed my kids organic, minimally processed foods, use non-toxic cleaning and personal care products, and treat things holistically when I can. I also believe in science. You don't have to ignore modern medicine simply because you aim for a more "natural" approach to life.

Disclaimer: I am not a medical doctor. Not a scientist. Just a mom who has done a vast amount of reading on vaccines and is sharing that information with you here.

Overall info/resources: comprehensive, all-encompassing resources for any vaccine question.


Websites:

Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh Vaccine Education Center

 

Immunization Handbook: Comparing Disease Side Effects to Vaccine Side Effects


Meta-Analysis of Vaccine Safety Studies


Vaccine FAQs


Books:
Vaccines and Your Child: Separating Fact From Fiction (Dr. Paul Offit and Charlotte Moser)


Your Baby's Best Shot (Stacy Mintzer Herlihy and E. Allison Hagood)

Podcasts: 

The Unbiased Science Podcast


Vax Talk Podcast



Autism/Regressions: the association between vaccines and autism has been studied hundreds of times from countries all around the world. They have all come to the same conclusion: that there is no association between the two.

Speech and developmental delays present most commonly around the ages of 1-2 years old. When regressions occur, the misinformed rhetoric says it must be vaccines when in fact they are in the age range where regressions typically occur because of synaptic pruning.


Meta analysis, including five cohort studies and five case control studies, totaling almost 1.3 million children. 


“Findings of this meta-analysis suggest that vaccinations are not associated with the development of autism or autism spectrum disorder. Furthermore, the components of the vaccines (thimerosal or mercury) or multiple vaccines (MMR) are not associated with the development of autism or autism spectrum disorder.”



“There was no increase in the risk of autistic disorder or other autistic-spectrum disorders among vaccinated children as compared with unvaccinated children.”


https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1124634/


Literature Reviews of Studies Examining Link Between Vaccines and Autism


Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Vaccines and Autism Overview

Vaxopedia Debunking Wakefield Autism Link


SIDS: Vaccines do not cause SIDS. In fact, fully vaccinated babies actually have a lower rate of SIDS.


SIDS cases peak between 2-4 months, so this is falsely attributed to vaccines because babies receive vaccines at 2, 4, and 6 months. When “SIDS” has been present for hundreds of years. 

“Conclusions: Immunisations are associated with a halving of the risk of SIDS. There are biological reasons why this association may be causal, but other factors, such as the healthy vaccine effect, may be important. Immunisations should be part of the SIDS prevention campaigns.”


https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17400342/


“Conclusions: This study provides further support that immunisations may reduce the risk of SIDS.”


https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16945457/


Michigan Department of Health and Human Services Collection of SIDS and Vaccines Research Studies

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia SIDS and Vaccine Database

John Hopkins Institute for Vaccine Safety Vaccines and SIDS


American Academy of Pediatrics Fact Check: There is No Link Between Vaccines and Sudden Infant Death Syndrome


Vaccine Ingredients: you often hear of "scary" ingredients in vaccines. However, it is necessary to understand their quantity and function to fully grasp the safety of these ingredients.

Ingredient Guide from Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Mercury
This conflation with "mercury" & vaccines occurs often.

  • Mercury: Mg, elemental metal, can be toxic at low doses.
  • METHY Lmercury: CH2Hg*, can accumulate & be toxic at low doses.
  • ETHYLmercury: DIFFERENT compound, C2H5Hg*, rapidly excreted, NOT toxic at low doses
  • thimerosal: ANOTHER compound, C9H9HgNaO2S, rapidly excreted, NOT toxic at low doses

Thimerosal hasn't been used in routine childhood vaccinations since 2001


Formaldehyde

Formaldehyde is often used to kill or weaken the virus or bacteria used to make a vaccine and is removed during the manufacturing process. Only trace amounts remain in a vaccine. Formaldehyde is naturally produced in the body and as a byproduct of metabolism. There is about ten times more formaldehyde in an infant's body at any given time than is found in a vaccine. An adult produces 42,000x more formaldehyde each day than in any vaccine.

Pharmacokinetic modeling as an approach to assessing the safety of residual formaldehyde in infant vaccines


Formaldehyde in vaccines


Polysorbate 80

GRAS (generally regarded as safe) and the generally safe accepted daily intake is 25 mg/kg. In a 5 kg baby, that would be 225 mg DAILY.

If a vaccine contains Polysorbate 80, is typically a concentration of 50 micrograms per dose; so the safe daily intake is 4,500 times greater than the amount in a vaccine.

A vaccine contains about 50 micrograms of Polysorbate 80. 1/2 cup of ice cream contains 170,000 micrograms.

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Vaccine Ingredients: Polysorbate 80

Global Vaccine Alliance Vaccine Ingredients Overview


Aluminum

Overall info: https://www.chop.edu/vaccine-education-center/vaccine-safety/vaccine-ingredients/aluminum


Studies showing the safety of aluminum in vaccines: 




How is aluminum processed by the body?

The distribution of aluminum via IM is quite complicated to model in terms of pharmacokinetics. At injection site, aluminum adjuvants (hydroxide and phosphate) are chemically inactive due to their very low solubility due to the body pH (7.4). They are present there as microparticles (micron-size) and slowly dissolve over time.


These microparticles will be swallowed by macrophages and dendritic cells as part of their routine work (cleanup and present stuff on their surface to immune cells) and will eventually migrate into lymph nodes nearby. These will act as antigen-presenting cells (APCs) which is key event in the immune response.


Aluminum salts will ultimately become solutes and circulate in the body as Al3+.  Al3+ from adjuvants will add up to the Al3+ coming from our daily exposure through food and drink, but at levels below detection (there is no evidence of a spike in aluminum levels before/after vaccination). 


The distribution inside the body will greatly vary between tissues and it also means their clearance will also be very different. In the case of brain, the amount entering the brain is ridiculously low (we estimate in the range of 0.01% of the amount found in blood), but will likely stay inside the brain forever (as of today, we can measure aluminum in the brains of healthy donors that died of old age). 


This is not a problem for most of the population, but has been source of problem in the past in certain patients that suffered from impaired kidneys and were exposed to massive amount of it as contaminant of medical products (dialysis fluids or IV bags). Hence, we have for now 30 years guidelines on exposure (no more than 5microg/kg/day from IV fluids) and monitoring (patients on dialysis have their blood aluminum measured on routine basis).


The elimination of it is mostly via kidney route, with 95% of it eliminated via the urine (hence the patients with kidney diseases being a population at risk for aluminum overload).


Studies on the elimination of aluminum from vaccines: 





Blood Brain Barrier:

Addressing Concerns of Vaccines Crossing the Blood Brain Barrier

Fetal tissue/cells
Understanding the use of fetal cells in vaccines


Fetal Cells FAQ


The only vaccines made using fetal cells include:

  • Chickenpox (varicella)
  • Rubella (the “R” in the MMR vaccine)
  • COVID-19 (viral vector versions, such as J&J/Janssen and AstraZeneca)
  • Hepatitis A
  • Rabies (one version, known as Imovax®)



Inserts

Inserts are legal documents. They are not a list of side effects, but rather ANYTHING that has happened during a vaccine trial. If someone had a seizure because they had epilepsy, but it was during the trial, seizures will be listed in the insert. They have to be listed even if they occurred once in a million doses or weren’t actually linked to the vaccine at all.


The actual language of the section on Adverse Events states:


“The following adverse reactions include those identified during clinical trials or reported during post approval use.” 


Aka, they are not side effects. These things happened after the vaccine, but were not necessarily caused by the vaccine.


Vaccine Inserts and Ingredients: What Parents Need to Know


Vaccine Safety


Fertility and carcinogenesis

I often see the anti-vaccine talking point about "look how many kids have cancer now" or "look at section 13.1 on the inserts" but there are many flaws to this point.

Preclinical Toxicology of Vaccines

Vaccines have been tested for these things. 


In fact, a 2017 study found that early childhood vaccines were associated with a lower risk of leukemia.


The section in the insert that states they’re not is referring to studies done in animals. 


“13.1 Carcinogenesis, mutagenesis, impairment of fertility. This subsection must state whether long term studies in animals have been performed to evaluate carcinogenic potential and, if so, the species and results.” 

https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-21/chapter-I/subchapter-C/part-201/subpart-B/section-201.57



Inert Placebo Trials: you often hear the rhetoric "but there were no double-blind, inert placebo trials" for vaccines as a reason for saying scientists cannot prove they are safe. This is not only untrue (as seen by some saline placebo trials below) but also minimizes the ethics and protocol involved in developing medicines.

To clarify, first generation vaccines are tested against an inert placebo. Next generation vaccines are tested against the previous generation vaccine because the whole point is to make something that works better and/or is safer than the previous generation. Basically, trial protocol is a lot more complicated than disinformation makes it out to be. New chemotherapy drugs are also tested against the current best-available treatments, not a saline placebo each time.


placebo controlled Pneumococcal trial: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3893185/


placebo controlled MMR: https://www.journalofinfection.com/article/S0163-4453(25)00027-1/fulltext


placebo controlled TDaP study in pregnant women: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/1866102


placebo controlled HPV trial: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17484215/


placebo controlled P2-VP8 Subunit Rotavirus trial: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7322558/


placebo controlled polio trial: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1114166/?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR5WMj-dtLoKcE0aEEECD49eRzsgPQ-aanedjeja6e7zQFrs0QreKbAjOjYnyQ_aem_c7d1Sokpn_lWlM3nBbXrpA


placebo controlled Hib trial: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2233906/

*This study shows low efficacy, but eight years later we can see how that has increased: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9781743/


Childhood vaccines placebo trials explained


History of Vaccines Randomized Clinical Trials

Controlled Vaccine RCTs (Living List)


Compilation of Randomized Clinical Trials by an Infectious Disease Expert

Vaccine development

Vaccine Development and Testing


The Process of Vaccine Development




Liability:

The National Vaccine Act of 1986 was made to protect manufacturers from frivolous lawsuits for things that could never be proven (i.e. I got cataracts at 80 and blamed my childhood vaccines. You technically can’t prove they didn't cause them 78 years later, etc). Manufacturers would be caught up in an endless stream of lawsuits and go bankrupt fighting them even if 99.9% were unjustified. It came about after a TV special ran, scaring people into an exponential increase in vaccine lawsuits. The manufacturers refused to produce vaccines anymore because of the potential costs and risks. That led to shortages and threats to public health. 

The VICP exists as recourse for reactions, which are possible with any medicine. It was designed to expedite the compensation process instead of the lengthy and expensive jury court system. If you file for compensation through the VICP and are unhappy with your compensation or choose to reject it, you can then sue the vaccine companies. It’s just easier to sue through the compensation fund.


But even with the Act. Vaccine makers do NOT have blanket immunity. There are multiple ways to sue vaccine makers for problematic vaccines. A clear truth of that is that there are class action and other lawsuits in the USA pending against Pfizer and other vaccine makers. If it were impossible to sue them, these wouldn’t exist. If you file for compensation through the VICP and are unhappy with your compensation, you can then sue the vaccine companies. It’s simply easier to sue through the compensation fund. Secondly, the Act itself only applies to some - not all - vaccines. The Act also has several conditions and exceptions (e.g fraud, misrepresentation of data, failure to comply with other laws, etc.). If the conditions are not met or any exceptions apply, then the Act by its very terms does not apply. Fourth, the Act was intended to protect vaccine makers from unforeseeable unavoidable harm. If the harm is foreseeable and avoidable, the Act does not apply. Furthermore, the Act allows claimants to reject any judgment of the Vaccine Court and file an action in regular civil court. Sixth, the Act does not prevent the government from imposing heavy fines and other penalties on vaccines makers for improper labeling and marketing of their vaccines. The Act does not bar shareholders from suing vaccine makers for problematic vaccines that reduce the value of their shares. 



Overall Health: a common anti-vaccine myth is that unvaccinated children are "healthier" than vaccinated children. This is a hasty generalization logical fallacy based on their own children (which, by two fully vaccinated children have never even had an ear infection, but I'm not out here saying vaccinated kids never get them).

KIGGS Study: Vaccination Status and Health in Children and Adolescents

Conclusion: "The prevalence of allergic diseases and non-specific infections in children and adolescents was not found to depend on vaccination status."

Study compares non–vaccine-preventable illness in vaccinated, unvaccinated children

Lack of broad functional differences in immunity in fully vaccinated vs. unvaccinated children


Myth: No Studies Compare the Health of Unvaccinated and Vaccinated People



MTHFR: In "crunchy" communities, you hear that the MTHFR gene is SO important, and those that have a variant should not vaccinate. This is untrue; MTHFR has become a scapegoat or "buzz word" in the wellness world.

MTHFR is an enzyme that helps maintain the balance of homocysteine in the body by aiding in the processing of folic acid/folate. The MTHFR gene is the gene responsible for the production of this specific enzyme. Many variations exist, and over half of all people have at least one MTHFR variant. 


It is estimated that 44% of people are heterozygous (have one copy of the C677T allele (CT]) and 10% of people are homozygous (have two copies of the C677T allele (TT]). Less than 50% of people have the typical alleles (CC).


MTHFR helps process folate into its active form. It helps you convert one form of folate (5, 10-methylenetetrahydrofolate) into

another form (5-methyltetrahydofolate).


Most individuals with a MTHFR variant process folate normally. However, some with this variant may have reduced MTHFR enzyme function and "use up" folate faster. These individuals may need to take a folic acid supplement to maintain normal levels of folate in their body. These individuals CAN and DO process folic acid. When studied, individuals with the C677T (TT) variant who consumed the same amount of folic acid as someone with the typical gene expression (CC), only had about 16% less folate in their bloodstream. Blood levels were only slightly lower than normal blood levels in those with affected enzyme function. 


So what does this mean regarding vaccination? Nothing. Vaccines do not contain, nor affect, folate levels. Having a MTHFR variant does not matter when it comes to vaccines. Only one study (2008) has ever shown a correlation between MTHFR variants and vaccination. These individuals were more likely to have a slightly higher fever, swollen lymph nodes, or rash after smallpox vaccination. No individuals had severe or long lasting effects. Smallpox vaccines are notorious for these outcomes in any population.This vaccine is no longer given to the general public in the U.S, so it’s not really relevant. The authors of this study agreed that this data should NOT be used to recommend skipping any vaccines.


Adverse events after vaccinations are very rare (about 1 in a million). Over HALF of the population has at least one MTHFR variant. If individuals with these variants were more likely to have adverse events, the rates of adverse events would be massive during vaccine trials. We would see large numbers of children experiencing adverse events on a daily basis while being routinely vaccinated. We monitor for safety signals constantly, and this would have been noticed quickly on such a large scale.


Only one condition has shown a definite link: Individuals with the C677T variant have a higher likelihood of delivering a baby with a neural tube defect. Even after thousands of studies, there has been no conclusive link to other medical conditions. 


Vaccines are safe for these individuals. There is no data indicating otherwise.


Homocysteine and MTHFR Mutations

Assessing the association between the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) 677C>T polymorphism and blood folate concentrations: a systematic review and meta-analysis of trials and observational studies


Regulation of glutathione synthesis

ACMG Practice Guideline: lack of evidence for MTHFR polymorphism testing

Genetic Basis for Adverse Events Following Smallpox Vaccination

Vaccines, DNA, and 23&ME

Deep into the MTHFR



Debunking Anti-Vaccine Myths


Global Vaccine Schedules: "The US gives way more vaccines than any other country."

Canada, the UK, Australia, Israel, Austria, Japan, Germany, and more have very similar (and almost identical in some cases) to the US.


Global immunization comparison: https://illinoisaap.org/global-vaccine-schedule-comparison-chart/


Vit K: "It has a black box warning"

The black box warning is regarding rapid IV administration of large doses given to adults for reverse overdoses of blood thinners (incidence 3/10,000). Not the tiny amount given to neonates. 


https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6714635/

Evidence Based Birth: Vitamin K

Shedding: "The vaccinated shed and make the unvaccinated sick."

Vaccine shedding refers to the release of weakened virus particles from a person who has received a live-attenuated vaccine — a type of vaccine that uses a weakened form of a virus to stimulate immunity. These vaccines are designed to replicate, or make copies of themselves, in a limited and controlled way in the body to trigger a strong immune response. Sometimes the weakened virus can be shed (released) through bodily fluids like stool or respiratory droplets.
  • Examples of live-attenuated vaccines include:
  • Measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine
  • Varicella (chickenpox) vaccine
  • Rotavirus vaccine
  • Intranasal flu vaccine (FluMist)
  • Oral polio vaccine (OPV) — no longer available in the U.S.
Importantly, shedding does not mean transmission. When a weakened virus is shed, it is unlikely to cause illness in others. In fact, the only live vaccine historically associated with transmission is the oral polio vaccine (OPV), which is no longer used in the U.S.


Vaccine Shedding Is Real — But Not What You Think


Measles

Not a single instance of shedding from a recently vaccinated person, causing measles in another person, has EVER occurred. 


https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27083423/


Guidelines for vaccination

“Household contacts and other close contacts of persons with altered immunocompetence should receive all age- and exposure-appropriate vaccines, with the exception of smallpox vaccine. Receipt of vaccines will prevent the vaccine-preventable disease, so there can be no potential transmission to the contact with altered immunocompetence. The live MMR, varicella, and rotavirus vaccines should be administered to susceptible household contacts and other close contacts of immunocompromised patients when indicated. No specific precautions are needed unless the varicella vaccine recipient has a rash after vaccination, in which case direct contact with susceptible household contacts with altered immunocompetence should be avoided until the rash resolves.”


https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/imz-best-practices/altered-immunocompetence.html



A Shot In the Dark

The First Five Errors in A Shot in the Dark


Everything Candace Owens Gets Wrong in Episode 1


Turtles All the Way Down

Science Based Medicine did a 10 part rebuttal of this book. Here’s part 1.


Turtles All the Way Down” repeats anti-vaccine misinformation



Humphries/Dissolving Illusions

On page 355 Humphries claims:

"Thirteen million doses of measles vaccine are injected each year. Those live viruses are attenuated, and the strains will vary from time to time in the manufacturing process, which means that immunity to one strain does not necessarily confer immunity to wild virus or to future virus."


https://www.chop.edu/vaccine-education-center/vaccine-details/measles-mumps-and-rubella-vaccines


There are 23 different genotypes of the measles. That means their genetic combinations look different - of those only one is the vaccine strain, strain A. But all of the different genotypes have the same stereotype, what the immune system is trained to recognize from the vaccine strain. So the measles vaccine actually protects against all the different strains.  


Science Based Medicine Review of Dissolving Illusions


Why Suzanne Humphries is Lying to You about Measles


Joe Rogan Podcast Appearance: 

Lies, Damned Lies, and Suzanne Humphries


Humphries Repeats Debunked Claims about Polio and Vaccines



Dr. Bob Sears/The Vaccine Book

1. He came out and said there is no evidence behind his schedule, just his own made up idea. 


2. His book is written in a way that gives the wrong impressions without outright saying the wrong thing. It downplays the diseases and presents a lot of anti-vaccine talking points regardless of the merits of these arguments. 


3. As one example, if you read the chapter about measles (to understand the risks of the disease) you will NOT learn about SSPE, which is a rare but fatal measles complication that shows up years after infection.


His book also doesn't mention immune amnesia, which is another measles complication that causes the immune system to "forget" how to fight previously encountered diseases.


4. Dr. Sears discusses things that get reported after vaccination, as if they happened because of vaccination. Even when we have quality evidence showing this is not the case.


5. He also will rarely give a proper risk comparison. For example, he mentions that there is a risk of GBS from flu vaccination. He does NOT mention that this risk is so tiny, 1 for every million vaccinations. His chapter about flu does NOT tell you that flu infections cause GBS. Approximately 17 per one million cases. So you are about 17x more likely to develop GBS from the flu itself than the vaccine.


The Problem With Dr. Bob's Alternative Vaccine Schedule



Thomas/Vaccine Friendly Plan

Paul Thomas lost his medical license for his gross negligence as a doctor. Failing to perform his duty as a medical professional by not having vaccines available to his patients who did want them. The role he played in the eight week hospitalization of an unvaccinated six year old boy from tetanus. And over ninety instances of malpractice. 


The studies he conducted at his own practice were never verified, with concerns that he manipulated or even fabricated the data. When a court asked him to provide the data to verify his studies, Thomas refused. 


https://www.thelundreport.org/content/judge-orders-anti-vaccine-beaverton-pediatrician-identify-patients-study


His book takes snippets of “truth” and manipulates them to fit the narrative he wants to convey. It has been widely criticized and debunked by the scientific community. 


Oregon Medical Board Suspension of License Documents

Anti-vaccine Portland pediatrician’s license suspended; cases include boy hospitalized with tetanus


Prominent Anti-Vaccine Pediatrician Dr. Paul Thomas Has License Suspended by the Oregon Medical Board



Vaxxed
Science Based Medicine: Antivaccine Propaganda at its Most Pernicious



Just the Inserts

They intentionally mislead people about the information in inserts to make the products seem "scarier" than they are. 


For example, under the Adverse Reactions heading of all her write ups she says “Per the CDC, adverse reactions are an undesirable medical condition that has been demonstrated to be caused by a vaccine.” and then lists events reported during clinical trials and post marketing experience. But this definition is not applicable to the FDA regulated inserts and events can be listed on inserts regardless of causality, which is even directly stated on most of the inserts she’s referencing. 


On her write up on Gardasil, she states that the vaccine “can cause death” but what the insert actually says is that there were some deaths reported during the clinical trials, none of which were vaccine related. Those deaths included car accidents, a plane crash and a gunshot wound. 


So she’s presenting reported events as known side effects that have been proven to be caused by a vaccine when that’s not true and some of the events aren’t even related to vaccines at all. 

She references a "study" by Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare Inc that claims only 1% of adverse events are reported. However, she neglects to mention that this proposal was for their own automatic detection system. And that this number was achieved by collecting data post vaccination and any ambulatory event, new prescription, or laboratory test that they deemed "suggesting" an adverse event were counted. And then compared that number to actual VAERS reports to end up with 1%. She includes information that fits her narrative and ignores important information that doesn't.



Physicians for Informed Consent

Misleading Vaccine vs Disease Table


Science Rejectionism of PIC

PIC is a Radical Anti-Vaccine Group


Inconvenient Study/Henry Ford Study

Documentaries are not a reliable source of evidence. Anyone can make a documentary on anything, it doesn’t have to be true. 


Del Bigtree is a producer, not a scientist nor a doctor, who has produced several anti-vaccine “documentaries” debunked by the scientific community. He has misstated facts on public health outbreaks (giving straight up fabricated numbers and details of vaccinated vs unvaccinated), incorrectly read vaccine inserts (publicly stating that safety studies lasted five days lol), and said that wearing a mask during COVID was dangerous to your health. He also wore a Star of David and claimed the “persecution” anti-vaxxers experience is akin to Jews during the Holocaust. 


As for the study his movie focuses on, it is a deeply flawed study that was never submitted for publication because of the major issues. Its methodology and raw data are not publicly available for scrutiny for this reason. But from what we can see, there are numerous problems:


1.  The vaccinated and unvaccinated groups were not comparable from birth, differing in characteristics like sex, race, and birth weight, which can affect health outcomes.


2.  The vaccinated children had significantly more healthcare visits, increasing the likelihood of diagnosis compared to unvaccinated children with fewer visits.


3. The study did not account for the fact that many children might leave the system for care after infancy, making it difficult to track diagnoses made outside the Henry Ford system.

Why a study claiming vaccines cause chronic illness is severely flawed – a biostatistician explains the biases and unsupported conclusions


Henry Ford Health Denounces Claim That System Suppressed Research, Cautions Against Dangerous Viral Disinformation and Misinformation



Feel free to comment or DM me on Instagram with any questions on what you've read!

Comments

Popular Posts